Sex Law Expert Belinda Brooks-Gordon: Why the Nordic Model of Prostitution Does Not Work

Jan 28, 2014
0 0

An expert on prostitution laws and their effect on society has said the “Nordic Model”, which criminalises the client rather than the sex worker, is “extremely dangerous”.

Dr Belinda Brooks-Gordon, reader in psychology and social policy at Birkbeck, University of London, and author of The Price of Sex: Prostitution, Policy, and Society, made these comments following a vote in the European Parliament’s Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Committee, which passed through a report recommending the adoption of this model.

The Swedish government passed the law that makes it illegal to buy sex, but not sell sex, in 1999. The model has since been adopted in Norway and Iceland, and is currently being pushed through parliament in France by women’s rights minister Najat Vallaud-Belkacem.

Advocates for the law say it protects women from dangers such as sex trafficking. However, others say it actually places both women and men at far more at risk.

Speaking to IBTimes UK, Brooks-Gordon said: “Any law has to be based on some philosophy or evidence, for example, harm is one – the reason murder or theft is a crime is because they cause demonstrable harm. There is no reason to criminalise prostitution clients when you cannot show demonstrable harm. In fact all the evidence is in the other direction, that it is harmful to criminalise.”

She said criminalising the purchase of sex can lead to blackmail, that it makes both clients and sex workers less likely to report violence and that it leads to other levels of underground criminality.


“Like with other forms of prohibition it criminalises a vast group of people who would otherwise be law abiding. When you have a law that is based on morality, morality around which not everybody agrees, you end up with something called status law or symbolic law.

“And that was the example with prohibition. You then end up with the legitimacy of the law being called into question. We had it here with our abortion laws and our divorce laws. It brings the law into disrepute. You end up with upright citizens and members of the establishment completely side-lining the law.”

But why are many politicians so keen to see this law pushed through? In 2010, Mr Justice Eady said: “Dangerous and discriminatory new provisions against sex workers’ clients have repeatedly been put before parliament in England and Wales. Female ministers keen to punish clients of sex workers eagerly supported the Bill. However, while sex work has become a rights issue it is no longer just about women’s rights.”

Brooks-Gordon explained: “Some female ministers have a vested interest because they feel that they like to be seen to be giving something to women. And this is something that they can give to women. That completely undermines the argument or the evidence that 25% of men who pay for sex pay other men for sex. When you put that argument to them, they try to side-line it and say ‘no we’re saving women’.

“It’s [also] been picked up by a lot of radical feminists. One strand of feminism finds it very attractive. Within separatist lesbian feminism whose ideology is that all heterosexual sex is exploitation, because the only way to overthrow patriarchy is to only ever sleep with women, they find it very attractive.”

Explaining how the Swedish law came to pass, Brooks-Gordon said it was pushed through at a time when there were huge concerns over immigration: “They were having a referendum and tempers were very frayed. When you look at the discourse around that, it was ‘look at these dirty black people invading our clean white land’ – really racist discourses – because there was a fear they would be overrun and this led to rhetoric around trafficking.

Keep Reading

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Spread the love
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ernest Greene
Ernest Greene
9 years ago

At last, someone else points out the racist undercurrent just below the surface of these spurious arguments about trafficking. The issue wasn’t even on the radar screens of anyone but a few fanatical sex-work haters back when most of the migrant sex workers were European. But when non-white immigrants began to show up in significant numbers among sex workers the whole argument gained a new momentum. The reason anti-porn fanatics like Gail Dines are suddenly so popular over there has little to do with prostitution and everything to do with keeping Europe white. Some friends she’s got, including conservative clerics… Read more »


[…] theories regarding the best way to move forward, the government seems keen to bring in the “Nordic” approach to prostitution, which would criminalize the purchase of sexual services but not their sale. The underlying […]


[…] two most commonly discussed legislative models are legalization, like in the Netherlands, and the criminalization of clients and managers, like in Sweden — both of which have serious […]


[…] ‘Nordic’ model of sex work legislation, implemented in Sweden, Norway and Iceland, does not criminalize selling sex, but does criminalize […]


[…] similar law is being planned in Europe along the lines of countries such as Norway and Sweden where clients are criminalized for buying […]


[…] Minister Peter MacKay has been vocal about his plans for legislation that includes elements of a “Swedish” or “Nordic” regime—where clients and third parties are directly targeted through criminal law. Legislation of this […]


[…] Durocher, a male escort from Montreal, discusses reasons to oppose the counterproductive “Nordic Model” of prostitution law: not all sex workers are women, not all clients are men, and the […]


[…] are legions of examples that illustrate this, and one is the debate surrounding the so-called ‘Nordic model’ of prostitution, a legal doctrine that outlaws the purchase but not the sale of […] - Buy & Sell Adult Traffic
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x