The email below was forwarded to me this morning:

The 3^rd Circuit issued its opinion today after rehearing in our challenge to 2257. It is a major victory. The court agrees with our argument  that strict scrutiny applies to all of our First Amendment claims, vacates the district court’s decision upholding the statutes and remands for the district court to evaluate the statutes under strict scrutiny. The court also expands  our relief under the Fourth Amendment and declares the inspection provisions of the statutes and regulations facially unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment.

FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC.; AMERICAN

SOCIETY OF MEDIA PHOTOGRAPHERS,

INC.; THOMAS HYMES; TOWNSEND

ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a SINCLAIR INSTITUTE;

BARBARA ALPER; CAROL QUEEN; BARBARA

NITKE; DAVID STEINBERG; MARIE L.

LEVINE, a/k/a NINA HARTLEY; DAVE

LEVINGSTON; BETTY DODSON; CARLIN ROSS,

Appellants

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA

_____________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

District Judge: The Honorable Michael M. Baylson

District Court No. 2-09-cv-04607

The opinion is 65 pages long and Im to lazy to upload.. If anyone wants a copy I can email it