View Comments (9)

• It's fairly common knowledge that some of these chicks are so spun they will go to the extreme of threatening themselves and then lying about it. Another one lies about everything and is so paranoid she thinks people are standing outside her front door.

  For the number of times their lives have supposedly been in danger and/or threatened, and the numerous people that are allegedly trying to kill them - how is it that these nutjobs are still around causing trouble? Perhaps therein lies the real crime.

• Fuck you & Whiteacre! Nica has done more in erotic industry than you 2 & that nitwit Cindi Loftus could hope to do in 10 life times! You explain to me what credibility you have when erotic industry is in Southern California & you report about it from San Antonio, TX? Seems like a rather large disconnect to me ASSHOLE!!!

  • ahh is bitch boy mad...lol tell the dumb bitch to keep my name out of her mouth...ill give you 1000 bucks if you can say fuck you to my face and be able to walk away ..#PUSSY

• The incident with Julia Ann refusing to work with that guy happened some time ago -- Nica booked her to work with the guy, and then called to *inform* Julia of whom she'd be working with - -as if Julia hasn't demanded the right to approve whom she word with since the beginning of her career.

  Julia asks Nica who his agent is -- Nica says he doesn't have one. He's new, he's from San Francisco, and Nica is doing his booking(s).

  At this point, since he doesn't even have an agent, was it out of line for Julia to be concerned that this guy may not even be "talent"? Has he worked before, etc, etc...? In any case, it's her body; she can agree to work with, or refuse to work with, anybody she damn well pleases.

  So Nica the drama queen plays it like Julia -- who's worked for Chi Chi LaRue, and worked with Christian -- is somehow prejudiced against gays or bisexuals. It couldn't *possibly* her that Nica was being unprofessional....

  As far as I can tell, the only negative words from Julia to Nica (publicly) were a while back when Nica began a twitter attack on Julia's (and my) friend Melissa Monet. Julia stuck up for her friend.

  Over the a few days prior to this latest outburst, the Red Queen also took potshots at her previous employer, Sweetheart Films/Mile High Media. It seems clear to me that this attack on Julia Ann was because she'd recently shot with Nica’s replacement, the far superior director, James Avalon (who's also an awesome guy).

  The stunning implosion of this bridge-burning narcissist is truly awesome to watch from afar.

• I don't understand how someone who hires people can go onto Twitter and throw around the word "bitch" to describe talent. Julia Ann? She's only one of the most recognizable names in the industry. After years of working in the biz, she of all people shouldn't reserve the right to refuse working with an actor on any grounds she chooses? Especially when the "crossover talent" issue has exploded with health issues over the past two years??? AND this person is half of an organization setup to help talent overall? Wow. Talk about not having your priorities straight.

  And I can't even look at that picture of her. Half of the entire picture is her tongue. Gross. lol

• "Julia Ann? She’s only one of the most recognizable names in the industry. After years of working in the biz, she of all people shouldn’t reserve the right to refuse working with an actor on any grounds she chooses?"

  They are all whores. They open their veginas for money. Anyone who thinks that this is some partially noble profess needs to visit a shrink.

  Why you people debate this topic is insane to me. But good luck all the same.

  • Hey Willie, even "whores" get to choose whom they do the deed with -- it's not a question of nobility, it's a question of agency and the right to control one's own body. And, as with any career, the laws of supply and demand apply -- performers in greater demand and with greater market "value" earn more in the way of compensation and control. That's basic economics.

• i don't think anyone that works in porn [as a performer] should even be required to give a reason, or explain themselves. if they don't want to work with someone, for whatever reason[s] they don't have to. that should be the end of it. it's not like other workplaces where you can avoid and/or ignore other individuals you don't care for.

  • Correct. If one has to explain or justify one's choice, it makes that choice no longer one's absolute right -- it becomes, instead, a qualified right, subject to some external rationale.