View Comments (3)

• I found it quite weird. There is no actual connection between the changes that they are about to make and the reasons that they use to put forward that changes.

  For instance, why do someone really needs to stop updating "Hardcoregangbangs" and rebrand it with "Fantasygangbangs" while he claims that he does it in order "to serve a wider customer base in the future"??? With that practice you're not aiming to a wider customer base. You are more likely cutting down one proportion and hoping for a bigger one to get. If this is the case, to get more customers and become wider socially....they why don't you keep what you have and just ADD another one?? And you can make that new one even more grandiose if you wish...You can promote it even more than the olds one. But do not remove the old ones!!

  Unless you feel ashamed of your older choices there is no other need to remove the previous sites for getting a wider customer audience. On the contrary, if you keep all of your sites and you add your more "popular" ones you have a bigger chance to get more people and keep your old ones. It's not rocket science just pure logic. Unless there are some other reasons that you don't want to release on the press, the current ones are not really convincing me. They are quite contradicting and I am forced to conclude that either the management is confused and is not really knowing what it wants to do and they are just trying things in order to keep up with their business...or there some REAL reasons behind all that changes and they prefer to keep that reasons sealed and away from public.

  • Gee, Dim...why not just come out and say that you really think the reason Kink.com is making these moves is to protect themselves from AIDS Healthcare throwing more lawsuits and faked up HIV-AIDS incidents at them in order to fulfill AHF's condom mandate campaign? Or...are you really implying that they are really covering up something sinister??

    Maybe they simply think that the harder stuff has had its heyday, and they want to rebrand themselves under a newer, kinder label. Or, simply, they want to protect themselves from the kind of chicanery that AHF is bound to attempt, by decreasing the risk of contamination from outside sources.

    Either way, it's his company to do as he chooses. The rest of us can simply adjust.

    • Cool reply Anthony. I haven't thought it that way. It seems to be a war..maybe yes maybe not.

      At least kink could have protected or inform and notify its loyal members in due time. What if someone have a membership yet to expire for months or even a year at Publicdisgrace, And Publicdigrace have already stopped releasing new updates?