Parliament has 1 year to bring in new law as Criminal Code provisions remain in place
The Supreme Court of Canada has struck down the country’s anti-prostitution laws in a unanimous decision, and given Parliament one year to come up with new legislation — should it choose to do so.
In striking down laws prohibiting brothels, living on the avails of prostitution and communicating in public with clients, the top court ruled Friday that the laws were over-broad and “grossly disproportionate.”
“Parliament has the power to regulate against nuisances, but not at the cost of the health, safety and lives of prostitutes,” wrote Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin in the 9-0 decision that noted “it is not a crime in Canada to sell sex for money.”
The ruling was in response to a court challenge by women with experience in the sex trade, Terri-Jean Bedford, Amy Lebovitch and Valerie Scott that had resulted in an Ontario court ruling that overturned the laws.
The Ontario Court of Appeal later upheld the law against communicating in public, but sided with the lower court in overturning the provisions against living off the avails and keeping a common bawdy house or brothel.
“These appeals and the cross-appeal are not about whether prostitution should be legal or not. They are about whether the laws Parliament has enacted on how prostitution may be carried out pass constitutional muster. I conclude that they do not,” McLachlin wrote.
“I would therefore make a suspended declaration of invalidity, returning the question of how to deal with prostitution to Parliament.”
Nice to see some intelligent legal reasoning on this subject for a change. Perhaps this will start a counter-trend against the nonsense of the so-called “Nordic Model.” The Canadian model appears to be based on rational thought rather than ignorant prejudice. How refreshing.
[…] the Supreme Court of Canada declared three major prostitution laws unconstitutional in December, Valerie Scott called it the best day of her life. Now, Scott and other advocates for safer […]
[…] regime or, alternatively, “Dutch” approach that regulates prostitution in our country. Since the Supreme Court struck down criminal laws prohibiting communication in public for the purpose of p…, the Nordic regime appears to be the approach the federal government is favouring. But Canadian sex […]
[…] In December, the Supreme Court declared Canada’s prostitution laws unconstitutional. […]
[…] group intervened in the Supreme Court case that invalidated Canadian prostitution laws because they impose dangerous conditions on […]
[…] landmark Canada v Bedford decision in December 2013 deemed Canada’s three major prostitution laws unconstitutional. The Supreme Court gave the government 12 months to reform prostitution law. The Bedford decision […]
[…] The Liberal Party of Canada is opposing C-36. We have serious concerns that this legislation fails to comply with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the requirements outlined by the Supreme Court of Canada in the Bedford decision. […]
[…] Supreme Court of Canada strikes down country’s prostitution laws […]
[…] ignored by the government in its efforts to replace the prostitution laws struck down following the Supreme Court’s Bedford ruling last year is how the sex-worker industry would be regulated from an employment […]
[…] sick and twisted day for it to happen,” said Valerie Scott, one of three women behind the landmark Supreme Court case that declared Canada’s legislation on prostitution […]