X

New details about Chong Kim from Breaking Out’s James Barnes

New details in the strange case of “trafficking survivor” Chong Kim

Posted Monday on Breaking Out’s Facebook page:

Through all the talk we would like to address some of the questions and concerns regarding Chong Kim.

We have known her for over 4 years she has been a director for at least 3. Breaking Out is made up of former law enforcement, Licensed PIs, and current law enforcement whom support us.

The inconsistencies of her story we were all told initiated us to do a background check which we hadn’t done because we did not want to re-victimize a victim. That policy will change.

The check of employment history, address history, social security records as well as criminal history, has not lined up with what she told us as well as what was written in her book.

I also wanted to know what victim going through the tragedy she has claimed would not want her trafficker or trafficking ring to be stopped. We have the means to do this and have offered this for her safety. [In] our experience, a[n] organized crime ring would not be happy with her going around the country speaking about them.

We would also like to know why she would claim her first husband was killed by her traffickers when he is currently alive and well.

Originally we were told she was enslaved for 7 years and rose up to become a madame (i think everyone can see why that would be [of] interest in a organization like ours). However we were shocked to see, when Eden was released and we read her book, that changed to two years.

Now I ask again, I never heard of a victim rising up to madame within two years of captivity not when you can still make them money, but if true why tell us 7 years?

Again I’m going by survivors in our organization — hasn’t Chong ever seen a therapist for the tragedy she went through? We offered to send her if she needed to. We have survivors of sexual assault who are still seeing therapist after 20 years; its just a question I have had.

Why has she failed to mention a felony charge [of] theft by swindle in 2009 that she was convicted of? However currently [Kim] claims she escaped in 90s so again this couldn’t possibly have anything to do with her being a victim.

Where are all the prostitution charges and drug charges she claimed the corrupt police gave her while she was captive? How about the politicians and “A” list celebs she claimed were traffickers or customers in the warehouse she claimed to be held in? I always wondered where the other victims were she claimed she was with, to verify this?

We will be checking on the names she has told us as well as other organizations to try to verify.

How come being a director of a legit non profit has she never wanted us to hear her speak or contribute to us anything as much as a name mention when she knows we have showed results in this cause, gave her money, assisted her in anything she needed. I still havent found the records of her son burning her house down trying to kill her? Again this is what she told us and recently.

Why didnt she take our offer of helping her get her own 501c3? But she rather have used ours? Why has she claimed she has these meetings with celebrities but ask us for the money for the airline ticket? Could the celeb not afford one for her?

These [are] just some of the questions,concerns, and lies we were told.

You can doubt us, badmouth us however anyone who knows us will tell you we are a honorable organization who always does what we say we will do, we have results of successful cases,and we have done this without funding thus far. We only want to do the right thing for everyone and this is a distraction for everyone involved away from our work and our mission statement.

I have been trying to not post the results of BG checks etc [out of] respect for Chong Kim however I will have to if left with no choice, to protect our integrity

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Spread the love
Mikey South:

View Comments (1)

  • I've been wondering why this group is so quick to bash her after all this time. Why now? I wrote them TWO YEARS AGO about Chong's fraudulent statement on their website - demanding it be taken down. They immediately reacted by threatening me with lawyers - when it was them who had the false statement up above the button "donate here". They did take it down - but then never asked me a question about Chong. They never asked why I had her speak on the panel with me in 2008 about "Trafficking in Nevada" yet why I was no longer associated with her . After me telling them that the statement was false - they never got in contact with me again to ask me anything - like about our work with victims from 1987 on. They admit they were new in the field - so why not learn something about it from the "kids on the block" already? When they were asking me about Chong - I asked them if they wanted to help me with some cases I'm currently working on. They showed no interest in these victims - yet were all ears about Chong. Why? I noted that Oliver North is on their "friends" list - one of the men in the Iran Contras from the 1980's that I witnessed trafficking women. That made me more curious so I noted they claim to have PSA's running on various radio stations. Now I know that no one has run free PSA's for us since 1995 when the laws changed no longer requiring them to. So I contacted the radio stations who then told me that not only were they NOT running their PSA's - but they in fact knew nothing of these claims and were going to write back Breaking Out immediately to demand them to take down their logos they DID NOT HAVE PERMISSION TO POST on their site. I then found another fraudulent statement on their site. It said that Barnes had "contacted every other organization to see if they would cooperate" with them when they got started and that everyone refused. Funny - I don't remember a phone call like that. They also lied to one of us here - they told me they had not given Chong any money. Yet they state here that they did in fact give her money. So which is the lie? I'm a real BONAFIDE victim - my news clippings of my arrest are online and I even have my court records to prove my validity as a trafficking victim - yet no one seems to want to talk to me. Now why is that? Every single point that they raised about Chong has a valid possibility to someone who understands how trafficking works - yet when I tried to talk to them about these possible explanations - they blocked me and deleted my "friends" status and stopped talking to me. Seems they weren't so interested in the "truth" but only in what they wanted to hear. Again why? Time will tell what's up with these people - just as it has with all liars and cons.

Related Post
Leave a Comment