Of course AHF is against this. I wonder why? Oh yea AIDS is big biz to them. A cure for HIV would shut them down lol. It’s odd to me that this pill will be given to “700 gay and bisexual men and transgender women in Los Angeles, San Diego and Long Beach who are high-risk but not infected.” Why not porn-stars? I mean after all pornstars are the HIV threat right? LOL Every real HIV researcher ignores straight porn. Why? Because there’s like a 1 in a million shot of a straight performer testing positive. The last positive test on the straight side was 2004. How many scenes have been shot since then..Fuck you AHF.
Truvada, used to treat patients who are infected, will given to high-risk people who don’t have the virus. At $26 a day, the pill only makes economic sense for those at greatest risk, a study found.
California will test an HIV-prevention pill in an attempt to slow the spread of the disease in the state, researchers announced Tuesday.
The pill, which is already used to treat HIV patients, will be prescribed to 700 gay and bisexual men and transgender women in Los Angeles, San Diego and Long Beach who are high-risk but not infected.
“With this new prevention pill, we have another intervention to put in the arsenal to try and impact this epidemic,” said George Lemp, director of the California HIV/AIDS Research Program with the UC president’s office.
The program awarded $11.8 million in state grants for the prevention pill studies and efforts to get about 3,000 HIV-infected people in Southern California into treatment and keep them there. The grants will go to a group of UC schools, local governments and AIDS organizations.
There are an estimated 140,000 people living with HIV or AIDS in California, including about 30,000 who don’t know they are infected, Lemp said.
The pill, under the brand name of Truvada, is already approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating HIV but not for prophylactic use. In 2010, a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine said that it reduced the risk of contracting HIV by 44% to 73%, depending on how often participants took their medication.
The two-drug pill, produced by Gilead Sciences in the Bay Area, has side effects that include nausea and vomiting, and possible kidney problems when used with other anti-HIV drugs.
A recent Stanford University study showed that the pill, which costs about $26 a day, only makes sense economically if prescribed to people at high risk, such as those with multiple partners.
The prevention pill and counseling have “enormous possibilities” for high-risk people, said Phil Curtis, director of government affairs for AIDS Project Los Angeles, which will be recruiting participants. But more research is needed to measure the effects in the real world, when patients may not be followed as closely, he said.
“It is unrealistic to expect that a patient without HIV is going to see a doctor every month,” he said.
The director of San Diego’s study, Dr. Richard Haubrich of UC San Diego School of Medicine, said that when taken as prescribed, the pill can prevent HIV infection. But he said the biggest impediment is people taking their medicine.
In San Diego, researchers plan to use text messages to remind people to take their pill. In Los Angeles, researchers plan to regularly measure the level of the drugs in participants’ blood. Those who receive the pill will also participate in counseling and regular screening for HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases.
Critics say there is not enough evidence of the pill’s effectiveness to support its use. In addition, they say the pill could lead to more men not using condoms and result in more new infections.