Taken from James Deens interview on Refinery 29
My theory on porn for women is it’s just porn. Why is there porn explicitly only for women? By saying there needs to be porn for women, you’re basically isolating women as a gender, and saying, ‘This is how women should think. This is how their sexuality should be.’ It’s counterproductive (from what I understand) to the equality movement. Who says that one woman’s take on sexuality is the right way to think? One woman might like to watch a film with high production value and beautiful sex. Another might like some BDSM things with beating, degradation — and it doesn’t mean either is right or wrong. Pornography is made for individuals to find what they enjoy, and what turns them on. There’s no market research on this because sexuality is always developing, growing, and evolving. You could talk to a million people about what they like in porn, and you’re going to get a million answers of what a million people like in porn at that moment.”
James Deen is a tool.
you’re a tool.
I agree, Deen is tool. You should see him beat the crap out of women on Kink.com gang-bang shoots.
You obviously don’t understand the BDSM lifetyle.
Did you watch kink.com? James Deen is a tool!!!
So you like to watch James Deen porn?
James Deen is a tool!
James Deen is a tool who beats women.
I’m a fucking tool!
I see you alter people’s comments. Half-ass, weak-sauce journalist! So much for freedom of speech…hypocrite!
how many times do you need to say he is a tool? that’s not freedom of speech. it’s spam. if you want to be a dumbass, go do it at pwl.
She’s right. Your spamming
[…] sold on “porn for women” as a concept. In an August 2013 interview, adult film star James Deen […]