C-36 doesn’t represent the interests of sex workers, who deserve safe working environments

Aug 3, 2014
Education
0 0

From WhyShouldICare — 

On July 21, 2014, WSIC hosted a full house of Torontonians engaged in the topic of proposed prostitution Bill C-36.  We were pleased to have two highly qualified speakers leading the discussion: Sonya Barnett, co-founder of SlutWalk, www.afterbedford.com and vocal advocate for women’s rights and sexual freedoms, and Rachel, a board member Maggie’s Toronto Sex Workers Action Program.

Sex workers deserve safe working environments

Our speakers provided the WSIC audience with a comprehensive overview of the recently decided Bedford case, where members of the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) determined certain provisions of our Criminal Code as unconstitutional and in violation of s.7 of the Canadian Charter – right to life, liberty, and security of the person.

The provisions are loosely referred to as the bawdy house provision, living off the avails of a sex worker, and communicating in a public place for engaging in prostitution.  The SCC gave the government one year to address the finding, following which those criminal provisions found to be unconstitutional would no longer be of legal force and effect.

The government’s response to this ruling is the recently circulated Bill C-36 – a legislative product that sex workers challenge does not represent their interests, remains unconstitutional in its content, and put together after only minimal consultation with those working in the sex industry.

Keep reading…

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Spread the love
Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
C-36 doesn’t represent the interests of sex workers, who deserve safe working environments | Adult WIkiMedia
7 years ago

[…] The government’s response to this ruling is the recently circulated Bill C-36 – a legislative product that sex workers challenge does not represent their interests, remains …read more     […]

trackback

[…] Bill C-36, Canada’s proposed new law regulating the sex trade, may not be a long way from the street. (It was at the report stage in the House of Commons at press time.) But largely ignored by the government in its efforts to replace the prostitution laws struck down following the Supreme Court’s Bedford ruling last year is how the sex-worker industry would be regulated from an employment perspective. […]

TrafficHolder.com - Buy & Sell Adult Traffic
2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x