The Los Angles Times has reported on the email Weinstein sent to an AHF staff member in November 2012, which revealed that Weinstein wanted to “go after” L.A. County Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky and other county officials through the courts.
“It is time to take the gloves off,” Weinstein wrote.
We need to go after Zev [Yaroslavsky] directly and hard. He is the real power behind our problems with the County on porn, the audit and fee-for-service. Plus he is a lame duck and an arrogant jerk. His Berman-Waxman power base is dead and he and others need to be taught a lesson. The voters are with us.
Weinstein went on to say that the organization should call for county Public Health Director Jonathan Fielding, and Mario Perez, the head of its STD programs, to step down.
This needs to be coordinated with our legal strategy. I want to go to court much sooner than later. I am tired of us being on defense. We have little to lose considering how unreasonable they have been.
Then, in a lawsuit filed one month later, the foundation accused Los Angeles County officials of using audits of the nonprofit’s contracts to retaliate against it for criticizing the county and advocating for policies county leaders opposed.
AHF and L.A. County have tangled repeatedly over contract and billing disputes, questions about patient care and Measure B — the constitutionally suspect initiative bankrolled by AHF in 2012 to require adult film performers to wear condoms.
This week, the U.S. District Court of Central California threw out AHF’s retaliation lawsuit, issuing a stinging ruling that read, in part,
Rather than a sincere attempt to vindicate their First Amendment rights, the court fears [AHF] instituted this action in an effort to obtain a tactical advantage in their ongoing political battles with [the county] and obtain leverage.
Yaroslavsky said in an interview Wednesday that the ruling was a “complete vindication” of the county’s position. And he seized the opportunity to say what he thinks of Weinstein.
“Contrary to some high-minded First Amendment motivation, he’s shown to be a thug,” the supervisor said of Weinstein. “He’s used his nonprofit organization in a crass and bullying political way to get his way, which is to avoid being held accountable.”
The AHF lawsuit arose out of an audit in which the county claimed the foundation had overcharged the county by $1.7 million for its AIDS services by billing the county for costs that should have been allocated to other funding sources. The judge did not address which side was correct about the billing issue, but noted that the county has the right to audit its contractors.
Weinstein, in typical bit of misdirection, said that regardless of who was billed for the costs, all of the money was spent serving patients. He defended the organization’s political tactics.
Weinstein indicated AHF will appeal the ruling and continue fighting on the retaliation issue in an ongoing lawsuit in state court over similar allegations.
L.A. County is also fighting yet another costly lawsuit by AHF alleging that the county improperly awarded sole source contracts to other health service providers.
A thug and a bully. Yeah, that’s about right. I’ve had to deal with Mr. Weinstein face to face and while he can certainly turn on the charm, underneath he’s a two-bit Karl Rove.
“We would not have gotten to where we are today if we hadn’t fought like hell on behalf of our clients and our mission,” he said. Will wonders never cease? Weinstein actually told the truth about something. If he hadn’t done the things he did he wouldn’t be where he is right now. And just exactly where is that, Mr. Weinstein? You’ve destroyed your own credibility and that of your organization. You’ve alienated the entire L.A. political establishment. Weinstein may think the Waxman-Berman axis is no longer a factor, but big West Side contributors pay for his $638,000 yearly salary.… Read more »
[…] Isadore Hall and Michael Weinstein forced a bill on adult performers despite the vociferous opposition of the performers themselves. […]
[…] and owner, Peter Acworth, were financially damaged by AIDS Healthcare Foundation’s Michael Weinstein for “repeated defamatory statements,” according to a cease-and-desist letter sent last […]
[…] Michael Weinstein, the president of the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, is one of Truvada’s biggest critics. He’s called it a “party drug” and insists that its supporters are mainly interested in having sex without condoms. With the widespread use of the pill, he argues, the rates of other sexually transmitted infections in the LGBT community will actually rise. […]
[…] In February 2013, a federal court threw out an AHF lawsuit that accused Los Angeles County of retaliating against the group for criticizing its public health programs and policies. Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky called the ruling was a “complete vindication” of the county’s position. Of Weinstein, he said: […]
[…] throughout California was the brainchild of ciondom-obsessed AIDS Healthcare Foundation dictator Michael Weinstein, and Baptist minister/Compton Assemblymember Isadore Hall III […]
[…] is probably dust for this legislative season. Don’t think the issue is dead, however. Not when Michael Weinstein is […]
[…] 1887: “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Such can be said for Michael Weinstein, the President and CEO of AIDS Healthcare Foundation, a Los Angeles based non-profit provider of […]
[…] Michael Weinstein, president of the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, is many things—professional provocateur; contrarian pariah; enfant terrible of the AIDS activism world. But here’s one thing he is not: a reliable source on any matters relating to HIV/AIDS. Still, that hasn’t stopped myriad news outlets from reporting on Weinstein and the AHF’s pathetic, mendacious campaign against PrEP. […]