More Details of Summers Case vs. Stagliano Obtained

Jun 20, 2013
Anti-Porn
0 0

Summers can’t cover her tracks well enough for this to go anywhere. Someone needs to stick a foot in Rob Black’s ass

20130620-142121.jpg

More Details of Summers Case vs. Stagliano Obtained

Posted Jun 19th, 2013 05:38 PM by Peter Warren

LOS ANGELES — AVN has obtained a copy of the complaint filed Monday in Los Angeles Superior Court by adult performer Katie Summers against John Stagliano and his companies John Stagliano, Inc. and Evil Angel Productions, Inc.

In addition to the aforementioned defendants, the complaint names “Does 1 to 100,” who it identifies as “the agents, employees, co-conspirators” in inflicting the injuries and damages Summers alleges she suffered as a result of having shot a scene for Stagliano’s Buttman’s Stretch Class 4 without being apprised of the director’s HIV positive status. The document states that Summers “does not know the true names and capacities of Doe defendants 1 to 100” and “will amend the complaint to allege the true names and capacities when ascertained.”

In pertinent part, the complaint goes on to state, “During the filming of Stretch Class 4, Stagliano had sexual contact with” Summers and at all times prior to, during and after that shoot “knowingly concealed” from Summers that he was infected with HIV.

“As a result of said negligent conduct, although [Summers] has been advised that she has not contracted HIV, [Summers] has suffered damages,” the suit contends. The alleged series of actions, it continues, “was extreme and outrageous, going far beyond the norms of conduct which would be expected of someone in our society.”

The suit further describes the actions of the defendants as “oppressive, malicious, fradulent, and done with a conscious and callous disregard for [Summers’] safety,” thus causing her to suffer “severe emotional distress and damages.”

Although the complaint concedes Summers consented to Stagliano’s actions, it nonetheless maintains that his allegedly exposing her knowingly to a fatal disease without disclosing the existence of that disease constitutes sexual battery, one of its four formal charges.

“Furthermore,” it notes, “[Summers] consented to Stagliano engaging in sexual contact with [Summers] within the context of [Summers] and Stagliano acting in an adult film. Actors engaged in sexual contact during the production of an adult film in the state of California are as a matter of custom and practice required to provide evidence of testing for HIV, and are not allowed to engage in sexual contact if they have a test which indicates that they are HIV positive. [Summers’] consent to engage in sexual contact with Stagliano was predicated upon [Summers’] assumption that Stagliano had complied with these testing requirements, and based upon the assumption that Stagliano was not HIV positive. [Summers] would have never consented to engage in sexual contact with Stagliano had [Summers] known and been advised that Stagliano was HIV positive.”

The fourth and final cause of action in the suit (following negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress and sexual battery) charges the defendants with violating California Business and Professions Code Section 17200, which “prohibits acts of ‘unfair competitions, including any unlawful, unfair or fradulent business act or practice’ and ‘unfair, deceptive, untrue or misleading advertising.'” In connection with this claim, it calls for the defendants to “be enjoined and restrained from continuing to produce movies wherein Stagliano is engaging in sexual contact with others, without disclosing to others that Stagliano is infected with HIV.”

In addition to the above, the suit seeks for the defendants to compensate Summers for general damages, special damages, loss of income, medical bills, loss of future income, future medical bills, punitive damages, actual damages, incidental and consequential damages, restitution damages, attorney’s fees and costs, and other damages and relief as the court deems proper.

As well as the court papers for this case, AVN has obtained a copy of Buttman’s Stretch Class 4 and viewed the scene in question in its entirety. We can report that Stagliano’s only contact with Summers during the scene is some light touching and squeezing of her buttocks, breasts, stomach and legs, and that he states at both the beginning and end of the scene that he and Summers are in Florida. At no point in the footage does any part of Stagliano’s anatomy enter her body or touch her genitals.

Attempts by AVN to solicit comments from Summers’ attorney, Robert L. Starr, have been unsuccessful.

Image courtesy of Evil Angel.

AVN

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Spread the love
Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael Whiteacre
Michael Whiteacre
8 years ago

Oppressive, malicious, INTENTIONAL infliction of emotional distress? As in, “Hey, let’s trick Katie and get her upset!”? Since when does touching the HAND of a man who has not shown a detectable level of HIV in 15 years count as ‘exposure”? If a hand can expose one to HIV, then logic would dictate that a hand can also BE exposed to HIV. If touching a hand constitutes exposure, then all HIV + persons will be made pariahs overnight. What progress… Also, let’s make this perfectly clear: shooting for Evil Angel gets a performer MORE WORK. Good luck trying to prove… Read more »

crunkleschwitz
crunkleschwitz
8 years ago

Since she is a whore, can she write off the BJs to an attorney as a loss on her taxes next year? Poor dunce aint gonna see dime 1.

Houstondon
8 years ago

I’m with Michael on this one and I saw the scene in question. If a hand touching was dangerous, think of all those cases of AIDS that must have come from shaking hands. And for the wannabe net lawyers, since the scene was shot in close up POV, his hands were regularly and plainly visible as having no cuts or open sores (neither did her fine ass cheeks at that). Regarding the other scene now being offered since the lawsuit scene’s details are now being discredited, Santhiago was wearing a thick thong to protect herself while the director was rubbing… Read more »

trackback

[…] June 2013, Summers filed suit in Los Angeles Superior Court against Stagliano and his corporate entities, claiming that she […]

TrafficHolder.com - Buy & Sell Adult Traffic
4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x